You sit two papers, each 1 hour 45 minutes, each worth 102 marks and 50% of the GCSE. Each paper has four questions, one for each section of the religion, and you answer all of them.
Every question has the same four parts: (a) 3 marks, (b) 4 marks, (c) 5 marks, (d) 12 marks. That is 24 marks a question, 96 a paper, plus 6 for spelling, punctuation and grammar (SPaG).
There is no multiple choice and no 1-mark question. If you have seen AQA papers, don’t mix the two up.
Timing: about 26 minutes per question. Pearson suggests roughly 3 minutes for (a), 4 for (b), 4 for (c) and 15 for (d). The (d) is half the marks, so don’t let the short parts eat into it.
Order: you may answer the questions in any order. Many students start with the section they know best, but make sure you leave time for all four (d)s.
Paper 1: Religion and Ethics (Christianity)
Paper 2: Religion, Peace and Conflict (Islam)
Question 1
Christian Beliefs (+3 SPaG)
Muslim Beliefs (+3 SPaG)
Question 2
Marriage and the Family
Crime and Punishment
Question 3
Living the Christian Life (+3 SPaG)
Living the Muslim Life (+3 SPaG)
Question 4
Matters of Life and Death
Peace and Conflict
The two papers and their four questions
Exam tipExaminers report that weaker students left parts blank in some sections. Every specification bullet has been examined at least twice, so revise all of them.
Assessment objectives; command words
Assessment objectives and command words
AO1 (knowledge and understanding) is tested by (a), (b) and (c): 48 marks a paper. AO2 (analysis and evaluation) is tested by (d): 48 marks a paper.
The secondary command word matters as much as the first: reasons, ways, beliefs, teachings, responses, attitudes, purposes, solutions. Examiners gave 0 to answers that described the problem of evil when asked for solutions, and to answers about the causes of crime when asked for responses.
Pearson uses specification words in questions without explaining them: commodity, metaphorical, atonement, eschatology, Laylat al-Qadr, restorative justice, passive resistance, Harb al-Maqadis. Students who didn’t know the word scored 0. Learn every key term in each topic.
Command word
Part
What it asks for
Outline
(a), 3 marks
Three separate, correct points, each a short sentence
State
(a), 3 marks (sample paper only)
Three short facts
Explain
(b), 4 marks
Two points, each developed once
Describe (two differences)
(b), 4 marks, on four marked spec points
Two differences, each a practice or belief contrasted with another religion
Explain + source
(c), 5 marks
Two developed points and one source of wisdom and authority
Evaluate
(d), 12 marks
Arguments for and against a statement, judged, with a justified conclusion
Exam tipUnderline the two command words before you write: ‘Explain two reasons why…’ and ‘Explain two ways…’ need different answers.
AO1
Knowledge and understanding of religion and belief: the (a), (b) and (c) parts.
AO2
Analysing and evaluating religion and belief: the (d) part.
(a) questions
Part (a): ‘Outline three…’ (3 marks)
One mark for each correct point, up to 3. No development is needed or credited: extra detail wastes time.
Write three separate sentences, each on its own line. A list of single words (‘Creator, judge, lawgiver’) scores at most 1, and so does one sentence containing a list.
Each point must answer the stem. A true fact that doesn’t answer the question (‘Islam means peace’ when asked for attitudes to peace) scores 0.
Don’t repeat yourself: two ways of saying the same thing score once.
Worked exampleExample (Genious, Paper 1 Q2). Outline three features of a Christian funeral. (3)
‘Prayers are said asking God to give the person eternal life and to comfort the family.’A clear, correct point in a sentence: 1 mark.
‘The minister may read Jesus’ words ‘I am the resurrection and the life’ (John 11:25, World English Bible).’A different feature: 1 mark. The reference isn’t needed in (a), but it does no harm.
‘The body is buried or cremated, and the minister commits the person to God.’A third, separate feature: 1 mark.
3 marks. ‘Prayers, readings, burial’ as a list would score 1.
Exam tipPearson’s June 2025 advice: three sentences, each a different point. That is all (a) needs, so move on after about 3 minutes.
(b) questions
Part (b): ‘Explain two…’ (4 marks)
Two points, each developed once: point (1) + development (1), twice.
Development is extra information that links to both the point and the question: a reason, an example, a consequence, or a teaching. A different new point is not development.
‘This is in the Bible and the Bible is the word of God’ is not development: examiners have said so every year from 2022 to 2025.
More than two points earns nothing extra. Four undeveloped points still score 2. Use a separate paragraph for each point.
Watch for ‘different’: if the question asks for two different attitudes or beliefs, two points on the same side can’t get full marks.
Where the marks come from in (b) and (c)
Worked exampleExample (Genious, Paper 2 Q1). Explain two reasons why Muslims recite the Qur’an in Arabic. (4)
‘Muslims believe the Qur’an was revealed in Arabic, word for word.’Point 1: 1 mark.
‘The Qur’an says, ‘We have revealed it, a Lecture in Arabic, that ye may understand’ (12:2, Pickthall), so translations are seen only as explanations of the meaning, not the Qur’an itself.’Development of point 1, using a teaching: 1 mark.
‘Reciting in Arabic unites Muslims across the world.’Point 2, different from point 1: 1 mark.
‘Muslims in Britain, Indonesia and Nigeria all recite the same words in Salah, so they feel part of one ummah.’Development with an example: 1 mark.
4 marks. Stopping after each first sentence would give 2.
Asterisked content: 1B 1.6, 3.1; 2C 1.8, 3.3
Part (b): the ‘Describe two differences’ form
Four specification points are marked with an asterisk. On these, a (b) question can say ‘Describe two differences…’ instead of ‘Explain two…’. Pearson has never yet set one (sample papers to June 2025), but the specification allows it, so be ready.
Marks: for each difference, 1 for the belief or practice in the religion the question is about, and 1 for the contrasting belief or practice in the other religion. Twice: 4 marks.
Describing only one religion scores at most 2. Each difference needs both sides.
Link the pair with ‘whereas’ or ‘but’, so the examiner sees the contrast.
Make the two differences really different: ‘Christians pray in churches’ and ‘Christians pray in cathedrals’ is one difference.
In Islam answers, use Islamic terms (Jibril, not Gabriel) and don’t blur the two religions together.
Paper
Asterisked point
Compared with
Paper 1 (Christianity)
1.6 Eschatology (life after death); 3.1 Worship
Another religion you have studied: here, Islam
Paper 2 (Islam)
1.8 Akhirah (life after death); 3.3 Salah
The main religious tradition of Great Britain: Christianity
Worked exampleExample (Genious, Paper 1 Q3). Describe two differences between the use of music and of leaders in Christian worship and in Salah. (4)
‘In many Christian services, music is central: hymns, choirs, organs or worship bands,’Christian practice: 1 mark.
‘whereas Salah has no music or instruments; the words are recited or chanted by the voice alone.’Contrasting Muslim practice: 1 mark.
‘Christian worship in many denominations is led by an ordained priest or minister, who may be a woman in some Churches,’Second difference, Christian side: 1 mark.
‘whereas Salah in congregation is led by an imam, who is not a priest: any Muslim man who knows the Qur’an well can lead the prayer.’Contrast: 1 mark.
4 marks: two differences, each with both religions.
Exam tipEach asterisked topic on this site has its own practice question on a different comparison, so you can try all four.
(c) questions
Part (c): ‘Explain two…’ with a source of wisdom and authority (5 marks)
Marks: as (b) (2 + 2), plus 1 for one relevant source of wisdom and authority that supports one of your points. The question always ends ‘In your answer you must refer to a source of wisdom and authority’.
What counts as a source: a scripture (Bible, Qur’an), a hadith, a creed, a Church document (the Catechism, the 39 Articles, Humanae Vitae, the Book of Common Prayer), or an authoritative person (the Pope). Any relevant source counts, not only those named in the specification.
Quote or recognisably paraphrase it and say where it is from. Chapter and verse are not required, and a wrong verse number in the right book is ignored.
What loses the mark: a wrong attribution (calling a hadith ‘the Qur’an’, or a saying of Ali a saying of Muhammad); a bare reference (‘John 10:10’) with no content; a source tagged on at the end that doesn’t support a point; no source at all.
Don’t write ‘a source of wisdom for this is…’ or ‘SOWA’: just use the source inside the point.
A source used as the development of a point earns that development mark, not both. To be safe, develop the point and use the source.
Worked exampleExample (Genious, Paper 2 Q1). Explain two reasons why Muslims honour Dawud (David) as a prophet. In your answer you must refer to a source of wisdom and authority. (5)
‘Muslims believe Allah chose Dawud to receive a holy book, the Zabur (Psalms).’Reason 1: 1 mark.
‘The Qur’an says Allah ‘imparted unto David the Psalms’ (4:163, Pickthall), so Muslims respect the Zabur as one of the books revealed before the Qur’an.’Development (1) and a correctly attributed source (1).
‘Dawud is also honoured as a just ruler and judge.’Reason 2: 1 mark.
‘Allah made him a ruler on earth and told him to judge fairly and not follow his own desires (38:26), so Muslim leaders today are expected to rule with justice.’Development: 1 mark.
5 marks. Without any source the answer would score 4.
Exam tipMany students lose the source mark simply by forgetting it. Learn one short source for each specification bullet (each topic lists them) and check for it before you move on.
(d) questions
Part (d): ‘Evaluate this statement’ and its bullets
The (d) gives a statement in quotation marks, then says: ‘Evaluate this statement considering arguments for and against. In your response you must:’ followed by two or three bullets. Since June 2024 the bullets say must.
Non-religious material is ignored where it isn’t asked for. On a (d) with no non-religious bullet, examiners skip it, so it wastes time.
‘Many people’ or ‘some people’ is not a non-religious view. Say ‘Humanists…’ or ‘an atheist would argue…’.
Stay on the statement: argue about its key words (‘should’, ‘first’, ‘only’, ‘best’, ‘never’, ‘today’), not about the topic in general. Describing the Trinity is not evaluating whether the Creed explains it.
Sources aren’t compulsory in (d), but a teaching used inside an argument strengthens it.
Writing frames can hold you back. Pearson’s 2023–2025 reports warn that rigid formulas stop students judging arguments. Use a plan, not a script.
Bullet in the question
What you must do
If you leave it out
refer to Christian (Muslim) teachings (always there)
Use the religion’s beliefs and sources inside your arguments
An answer with no religious teaching hardly meets the levels
refer to different Christian (Muslim) points of view
Show that believers disagree: name traditions (Catholic, Protestant, Quaker; Sunni, Shi’a) and give each one’s reason
Maximum Level 2 (6 marks)
refer to non-religious points of view
Include atheist or Humanist views, named as such, and how believers respond
Maximum Level 2 (6 marks)
refer to relevant ethical arguments
Apply an ethical theory: usually situation ethics (do the most loving thing, agape) or utilitarianism (the greatest good for the greatest number)
Maximum Level 2 (6 marks)
reach a justified conclusion (always there)
Say how far you agree, and why the winning arguments are stronger
No automatic cap, but Level 3 or 4 is unlikely
The four kinds of (d) bullet
Exam tipBefore writing, circle every bullet. Tick each one off in your plan. Missing one costs up to half the marks.
Situation ethics
Joseph Fletcher’s theory (1966): in each situation, do the most loving thing; agape is the only absolute rule.
Utilitarianism
The theory (Bentham, Mill) that the right action produces the greatest good or happiness for the greatest number.
(d) levels-based mark scheme
How (d) is marked: the four levels (from June 2024)
A logical chain of reasoning: point → reason → teaching or evidence → what follows. ‘Christians believe X because Y, as shown in Z, so they would agree.’
Appraisal is what reaches Level 4: judging how strong an argument is and why. Is the teaching clear or open to interpretation? Do most believers hold this view, or a minority? Does the argument apply to the statement’s key word? Does it rely on a literal reading most Christians reject?
Not appraisal: ‘This is a strong argument because…’ followed by another reason. That is just more argument.
The conclusion can come at the start, in mini-conclusions, or at the end, and ‘I’ is allowed. It should follow from your appraisal, not from personal opinion alone.
Older mark schemes (before June 2024) use different level wording (‘deconstructs religious information’, ‘appraisal of evidence’). The question format is the same, so older papers are still good practice: mark them with the levels above.
Level
Marks
What it looks like
1
1–3
Superficial: bits of knowledge, undeveloped arguments, opinions just asserted
2
4–6
Basic: some developed arguments on different sides, limited knowledge, simple judgements loosely linked, a weakly justified conclusion
3
7–9
Good: logical chains of reasoning on different sides, sound knowledge, judgements clearly linked to the arguments, a partly justified conclusion
4
10–12
Sustained and coherent: logical chains of reasoning, thorough knowledge, judgements supported by appraisal of the arguments, a fully justified conclusion that follows from the analysis
The four levels, and the Level 2 cap
Worked exampleExample (Genious, Paper 1 Q3). ‘Christmas has lost its religious meaning in Britain today.’ Evaluate this statement considering arguments for and against. In your response you must: refer to Christian teachings; reach a justified conclusion. (12) [+ 3 SPaG marks]
For: ‘Many Christians would agree that, for most people, Christmas has become about presents, food and holidays. Only a minority of people in Britain go to church at Christmas, so the celebration of the Incarnation, God becoming human (John 1:14), is missing from many homes.’A logical chain with Christian teaching: Level 3 material.
Against: ‘But churches are often fullest at Christmas: carol services, nativity plays and Midnight Mass still tell the story from Matthew and Luke. Many Christians also see giving gifts and helping lonely people as expressing the meaning of Christmas, because God gave Jesus as a gift of love.’The other side, also with teaching.
Appraisal: ‘The first argument is strong about how most people celebrate, but weaker on the word ‘lost’: the religious meaning is still there and is still taught every year. The second argument is stronger, because it shows that even secular customs like giving can carry Christian meaning, though only if people know where they come from.’Judging the strength of each argument against the statement’s key word: this is what lifts the answer to Level 4.
Conclusion: ‘So I disagree. For many people in Britain the religious meaning has been pushed to the side, but it has not been lost, because churches still proclaim the Incarnation and many Christian customs still point to it.’A conclusion that follows from the appraisal.
Level 4 (about 10–11 marks). More specialist terms (Incarnation, Advent, nativity) also help the SPaG mark.
Spelling, punctuation and grammar
SPaG on Questions 1 and 3
Where: the (d) parts of Question 1 (Beliefs) and Question 3 (Living the religious life) on both papers. Each is printed as worth 15 (12 + 3). That is 6 SPaG marks a paper.
Specialist terms count for a lot: use them correctly and spell them right. Christianity: Incarnation, atonement, eschatology, sacrament, transubstantiation, liturgical, ecumenism, evangelism. Islam: Tawhid, Risalah, Akhirah, al-Qadr, Adalat, Imamah, Laylat al-Qadr, Zakah, Khums, Jummah.
Leave two or three minutes to read through your Q1 and Q3 (d)s.
SPaG mark
What it needs
0
Nothing written, off the question, or errors make it hard to follow
1 (threshold)
Reasonable accuracy, some control of meaning, a limited range of specialist terms
2 (intermediate)
Considerable accuracy, general control of meaning, a good range of specialist terms
3 (high)
Consistent accuracy, effective control of meaning, a wide range of specialist terms
Exam tipOn this site, Q1 and Q3 (d) questions end ‘[+ 3 SPaG marks]’: the 12 marks shown are for content, and the 3 SPaG marks are extra.
Examiner reports 2018–2025
The mistakes examiners report most
1. Lists in (a): three words score 1. Write three sentences.
2. No development in (b) and (c), or ‘development’ that is just a new point or ‘it’s in the Bible’.
3. Missing or misattributed sources in (c): a hadith called the Qur’an; Ali quoted as Muhammad; a vague ‘the holy book says’ that captures only the spirit.
4. Answering a nearby question: Christmas for Advent; the problem of evil for its solutions; the arguments against life after death for Christian responses to them; causes of crime for responses; al-Qadr (predestination) for Laylat al-Qadr (Night of Power).
5. Confusing pairs: Six Beliefs, Five Roots and Five Pillars; greater and lesser jihad; capital and corporal punishment; literal and metaphorical; artificial contraception and abortion; informal prayer, set prayer and liturgy; creation of the universe and origins of human life.
6. In Islam answers: ‘Gabriel’ for Jibril is not credited; don’t compare with Christianity unless the question asks you to.
7. (d) answers that describe instead of evaluate, or that ignore a bullet (capped at Level 2), or add non-religious views nobody asked for.
8. Wrong quotations: ‘there is neither male nor female’ is Paul (Galatians 3:28), not Jesus; ‘whoever saves one life…’ is the Qur’an (5:32), not the Bible.
9. Time: over-long (a)–(c) answers leave too little time for the last (d).
Exam tipPearson’s June 2025 reports end with the same advice for both papers: three sentences for (a); two developed points for (b); identifiable sources for (c); and in (d), appraise the arguments rather than follow a set format.