ECO10Market Failure, Externalities and Government Intervention
3.1.6.1 The meaning of market failure
Market failure and the misallocation of resources
Market failure: when the market system fails to allocate resources efficiently.
Misallocation of resources: resources go into making the wrong amounts of goods and services, so society is worse off than it could be (a welfare loss).
It shows up in two ways: too much of a harmful good is produced or consumed (e.g. goods that pollute), or too little of a beneficial good (e.g. too little exercise or training).
Why it happens: buyers and sellers weigh up only their own costs and benefits. Effects on other people are left out of the price.
Government intervention: action by the government to correct market failure, for example with taxes, subsidies or laws.
Exam tipDefine market failure in full: the market fails to allocate resources efficiently. “When the market fails” earns little. Adding “too much or too little is produced” shows you know what misallocation means.
Market failure
When the market system fails to allocate resources efficiently.
Misallocation of resources
When resources are used to make the wrong amounts of goods and services, causing a welfare loss to society.
Government intervention
Action by the government to influence a market and correct market failure.
3.1.6.1 Implications of misallocation of resources
The costs of misallocation
When resources are misallocated, someone pays. Often it is people outside the deal, taxpayers or future generations.
These costs aren’t in the price, so the good looks cheaper than it really is to society.
Moral and ethical questions: should people be free to choose, even if others are harmed? How much should today’s consumers think about future generations?
Cost
Example
Who bears it
Pollution and clean-up
Litter, dirty rivers, poor air
Local people; councils, so taxpayers
Health
Illness linked to smoking, poor diet or dirty air
Patients, families, the NHS
Congestion
Traffic jams in town centres
Other drivers, bus users, businesses
Lost output
Workers off sick; time wasted in traffic
Firms and the whole economy
Using up resources
Overfishing; burning fossil fuels
Future generations
Exam tipWhen asked about the costs of misallocation, say who bears each cost and why it matters: “more illness puts pressure on the NHS, so taxpayers pay more”. That chain of reasoning moves an answer up a level.
3.1.6.2 Defining externalities
Externalities: private, external and social
Third party: anyone affected by a transaction who is not the buyer or the seller.
Externality: a cost or benefit to a third party, outside the transaction. Nobody pays or is paid for it.
Private costs: costs paid by the producer or consumer themselves (e.g. a driver’s fuel). Private benefits: the benefit to the consumer of using the good (and the revenue to the seller).
External costs and external benefits fall on third parties.
Social cost = private cost + external cost. Social benefit = private benefit + external benefit.
So an externality is the difference between the social and the private figure: external cost = social cost − private cost.
Social cost and social benefit are the private and external parts added together (invented figures per unit)
Exam tipIn one exam only a quarter of students got full marks for defining social cost, and a third scored zero, often writing about social care. Learn it as a sum: private cost + external cost.
Third party
Someone affected by a transaction who is neither the buyer nor the seller.
Externality
A cost or benefit to a third party outside an economic transaction.
Private cost
The cost paid by the producer or consumer of a good.
Private benefit
The benefit to the consumer of using a good.
Social cost
The full cost to society of a good: private cost plus external cost.
Social benefit
The full benefit to society of a good: private benefit plus external benefit.
3.1.6.2 Negative externalities
Negative externalities of production and consumption
Negative externality: a cost to a third party outside the transaction.
From production: a factory’s smoke, noise from an airport, farm chemicals washing into a river.
From consumption: second-hand smoke, takeaway litter, exhaust fumes and congestion from driving, a neighbour’s loud music.
Because the social cost is higher than the private cost, the good is over-produced or over-consumed: the price paid doesn’t cover the harm.
Negative (external cost)
Positive (external benefit)
Production
A cement works covers nearby homes in dust
A beekeeper’s bees pollinate a neighbour’s orchard
Consumption
Drivers add to fumes and traffic jams
A vaccinated person is less likely to infect others
Externalities land on third parties, outside the deal between buyer and seller
Exam tipCheck whether a question asks about production or consumption. A pub’s noise at closing time comes from consumption (customers); a brewery’s smell comes from production.
Negative externality
A cost to a third party outside an economic transaction.
External cost
The part of the social cost that falls on third parties.
3.1.6.2 Positive externalities
Positive externalities
Positive externality: a benefit to a third party outside the transaction.
Examples: vaccinations protect people who aren’t vaccinated; education and training give other firms and society more skilled workers; insulation cuts energy use and emissions; a neat front garden pleases the neighbours; a new bus route takes cars off the road.
Buyers only weigh their private benefit, so the social benefit is higher than what they will pay for. The good is under-consumed, and too little is produced.
Exam tipExaminers report that many students think a positive externality is any benefit. It must fall on a third party. “People who take the new train save time” is a private benefit and scores nothing. “Fewer cars on the road, so less pollution for residents” is an external benefit.
Positive externality
A benefit to a third party outside an economic transaction.
External benefit
The part of the social benefit that goes to third parties.
3.1.6.2 Externalities as the difference between social and private
Calculating externalities and spotting them in a source
Three formulas, one idea: social = private + external. Rearrange to find the missing part: external = social − private; private = social − external.
Give the unit (£, £ million) and round as the question asks.
Spotting externalities in a source: for each effect, ask “who gains or loses?” If it is the buyer or the seller, it is private. If it is anyone else, it is external.
Worked exampleA paper mill (invented) has private costs of £5.2 million a year. River clean-up and health costs for local people add £1.3 million. Calculate the social cost.
Social cost = private cost + external cost
= £5.2 million + £1.3 million
£6.5 million a year
Worked exampleThe social cost of one short-haul flight seat is £180 and the private cost is £135 (invented). Calculate the external cost, and the external cost as a percentage of the social cost.
Worked exampleA college course raises a student’s future earnings by £8,000 (private benefit). Employers and society gain a further £2,500 (invented). Calculate the social benefit.
Social benefit = private benefit + external benefit
= £8,000 + £2,500
£10,500
Exam tipIf the question asks for a percentage, show the subtraction first. The working can earn a mark even if the final answer slips.
3.1.6.1, 3.2.3.4 Government intervention
Policies for negative externalities
Indirect tax: a tax on spending, paid to the government by the seller. It raises firms’ costs, so supply shifts left: the price rises and the quantity falls. The revenue can pay for clean-up. Examples: fuel duty and the Soft Drinks Industry Levy on sugary drinks. The compulsory charge for single-use carrier bags works in a similar way, though the money goes to shops, not the government.
Regulation, laws and bans: limits on emissions, no smoking in enclosed public places, age limits on buying alcohol. Firms or people who break the rules are fined.
Tradable permits: the government caps total pollution and issues permits. Firms that cut pollution cheaply can sell spare permits to others.
Information: health warnings and campaigns, so people understand the harm.
Subsidising a substitute: e.g. cheaper buses so fewer people drive. Say clearly that it is another product that is subsidised.
An indirect tax shifts supply left: price rises from P to P1, quantity falls from Q to Q1
Exam tipThese are micro policies aimed at one market. In two recent papers many students answered with macro policies such as “monetary policy” or “lower interest rates” and scored zero. A tax counts, but it must be a tax on the product, not income tax.
Indirect tax
A tax on spending, added to the price of a good and paid to the government by the seller.
Regulation
Rules or laws that limit or require certain behaviour, enforced with penalties.
Tradable permits
Permits to pollute, capped in number, that firms can buy and sell.
3.2.3.4 Policies for positive externalities
Policies for positive externalities
Subsidy: a payment from the government to producers (or sometimes consumers) that lowers costs. Supply shifts right: the price falls and the quantity rises. Examples: grants for heat pumps and insulation, support for bus routes and renewable energy.
Government provision: the government provides the good itself, often free at the point of use. Examples: NHS healthcare, state schools, free vaccinations.
Information and advertising: campaigns to encourage exercise, healthy eating or vaccination.
Regulation to encourage use: rules that require consumption, such as compulsory schooling.
A subsidy shifts supply right: price falls from P to P1, quantity rises from Q to Q1
Exam tipA subsidy is a payment that lowers costs. Examiners noticed students calling every kind of intervention a subsidy. A ban, a tax or free provision is not a subsidy. Name the method you mean.
Subsidy
A payment from the government to producers (or consumers) that lowers costs and raises supply.
Government provision
When the government provides a good or service itself, often free at the point of use.
3.1.6.1, 3.2.3.4 Evaluation
Evaluating the policies
Price elasticity of demand: if demand is price inelastic (e.g. cigarettes, petrol), a tax raises a lot of revenue but cuts consumption only a little. See the topic on price elasticity.
Measuring the harm: it is hard to put a money value on an external cost, so the tax or subsidy may be too big or too small.
Opportunity cost: money spent on a subsidy or free provision can’t be spent on something else.
Fairness: indirect taxes take a bigger share of a low income (they are regressive).
Government failure (optional term): when intervention makes things worse, e.g. a ban that creates a black market.
Policy
Strengths
Weaknesses
Indirect tax
Raises revenue; people keep a choice
Small effect if demand is price inelastic; regressive; hard to set the right rate
Regulation or ban
Clear and certain if enforced
Costs to police; black markets; no revenue
Tradable permits
Caps total pollution; cuts happen where cheapest
Hard to set the cap; complex to run
Subsidy
Lowers prices, so more is used
Costs taxpayers (opportunity cost); firms may come to rely on it
Government provision
Everyone can use it, whatever their income
Very expensive; demand may outstrip supply
Information
Cheap; respects free choice
People may ignore it; works slowly
The government’s toolkit for externalities
Exam tipFor a 9- or 15-mark question, compare the policy with an alternative and finish with “it depends on…”: how price elastic demand is, whether the rule can be enforced, and what else the money could buy.
Regressive tax
A tax that takes a larger share of income from people on lower incomes.
Government failure
When government intervention makes the allocation of resources worse (an optional term).
AQA vocabulary list (optional)
Merit and demerit goods (useful extra vocabulary)
Merit good: better for people than they realise, so it is under-consumed. Examples: healthy food, exercise, education.
Demerit good: worse for people than they realise, so it is over-consumed. Examples: fatty and sugary foods, cigarettes.
The cause is partly poor information: people don’t weigh the long-term effects on themselves.
Many merit and demerit goods also have externalities, which is the main idea AQA tests.
Merit good
A good that is better for the consumer than they think, so it is under-consumed.
Demerit good
A good that is worse for the consumer than they think, so it is over-consumed.